1) That the price of decay happens to be constant throughout time. 2). That the isotope abundances when you look at the specimen dated haven’t been changed during its history by addition or elimination of either moms and dad or child isotopes 3) that after the stone first formed it contained a known amount of daughter product (“Radioisotopes while the chronilogical age of the planet earth” pg v)
We ought to observe that processes that are past never be occurring at all today, and that some could have taken place at prices and intensities far not the same as comparable procedures today. ( “Radioisotopes while the chronilogical age of the planet earth” pg vii)
Jesus cursed the floor (the stones too!)
See my commentary on Genesis 3 verse 17 “..cursed may be the ground for the benefit”
Whenever this took place there was clearly a burst of radioactity that made the stones look avove the age of these people were.
Would not this make all of the stones look the age that is same?
“The stone real question is quite simple and has now related to the fundamental elements which made up these rocks at first. Whenever all these elements, uranium, potassium, radium etc. were started up, it might simply be normal in order for them to act relating to their specific properties, fundamentally acquiring stable half-lives of decay, at various prices. Leer más Acerca deDating methods are derived from 3 unprovable and dubious presumptions: …